Gitea vs Forgejo: Same Code, Different Owners
Forgejo is a fork of Gitea, and the difference is governance as much as features. What that means for a self-hosted git server you plan to keep.
Comparisons
Two tools, same job. Here is where each one is faster, cheaper, or more annoying.
A comparison is only worth reading if both sides were actually run. In every post below I installed both tools on the same box, fed them the same data, and wrote down what happened — including the parts where my preference changed halfway through.
Each table has the same columns: cost, licence, resource use, backup story, and who should skip it. If a tool wins on paper but lost in practice, that is what the verdict says.
Start here
Both terminate TLS and route traffic. The difference is how much config you maintain and what breaks at 2am — tested side by side for three months.
Forgejo is a fork of Gitea, and the difference is governance as much as features. What that means for a self-hosted git server you plan to keep.
A hands-on comparison of Paperless-NGX and Documenso for document management, covering self-hosting, features, and who should skip each.
At least a month for anything with a data path — backups, sync, media. For simpler tools a week is enough, and the post says which it was.
No. Some links are affiliate links, which means a commission if you buy through them. That is disclosed on the page, and it does not decide the verdict.
Because I have not run them. A comparison written from documentation is a summary, not a test, and those are easy to find elsewhere.